<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plurk vs Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/</link>
	<description>Social Media and Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:25:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: piska</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-6184</link>
		<dc:creator>piska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 06:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-6184</guid>
		<description>I have twitter and Plurk account, but i like Plurk ten Twitter, maybe because i have a lot of friend using Plurk. I loved the commenting system, and try to make more karma so i can get more emoticon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have twitter and Plurk account, but i like Plurk ten Twitter, maybe because i have a lot of friend using Plurk. I loved the commenting system, and try to make more karma so i can get more emoticon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-507</guid>
		<description>I use the both of them.  A lot of my friends still use Twitter and only Twitter, so I can&#039;t leave them assed out in the cold, but I also met some people who use Plurk, so I guess it&#039;s the best of both worlds maybe.

I love Plurk&#039;s commenting system.  The thing I&#039;ve noticed though is that it&#039;s not compatible at all with Opera.  Works fine with everything else, but if I try to do anything in Plurk in Opera it will be 10 times harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the both of them.  A lot of my friends still use Twitter and only Twitter, so I can&#8217;t leave them assed out in the cold, but I also met some people who use Plurk, so I guess it&#8217;s the best of both worlds maybe.</p>
<p>I love Plurk&#8217;s commenting system.  The thing I&#8217;ve noticed though is that it&#8217;s not compatible at all with Opera.  Works fine with everything else, but if I try to do anything in Plurk in Opera it will be 10 times harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [scribkin] RSS Reset Update</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>[scribkin] RSS Reset Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote an article comparing Plurk and Twitter that I quite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote an article comparing Plurk and Twitter that I quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre-Philippe Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre-Philippe Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this interesting comparison of those two microblogging platforms. I agree that Plurk is a little too smart for its own good, and would also favor Twitter&#039;s simplicity and larger network for now. Also, I have had problems with Plurk on one of my PCs where the &quot;timeline&quot; remains blank!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this interesting comparison of those two microblogging platforms. I agree that Plurk is a little too smart for its own good, and would also favor Twitter&#8217;s simplicity and larger network for now. Also, I have had problems with Plurk on one of my PCs where the &#8220;timeline&#8221; remains blank!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griffmiester</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>griffmiester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I’m completely agreeing with you on this. I have a plurk account, and I have a twitter account. Plurk I’m finding needs more time to be involved. Time which I don’t have.
I like that with twitter I can ignore it or use it as I need/want. What bugs me with it at the moment is all the issues, the outages, the reduced number of hourly API calls…
I’m sticking with twitter for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m completely agreeing with you on this. I have a plurk account, and I have a twitter account. Plurk I’m finding needs more time to be involved. Time which I don’t have.<br />
I like that with twitter I can ignore it or use it as I need/want. What bugs me with it at the moment is all the issues, the outages, the reduced number of hourly API calls…<br />
I’m sticking with twitter for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really like having to start all over again as well, though I&#039;m trying. The thing is, I think Plurk could really make it a lot easier to transfer your Twitter network.

Considering that most of us use the same userids on various sites, it shouldn&#039;t be too hard for them to create a one-click import tool. They could use the Twitter API, scan the list of people you are following, and search for people by that username on Plurk. It wouldn&#039;t be perfect, but it would make things much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really like having to start all over again as well, though I&#8217;m trying. The thing is, I think Plurk could really make it a lot easier to transfer your Twitter network.</p>
<p>Considering that most of us use the same userids on various sites, it shouldn&#8217;t be too hard for them to create a one-click import tool. They could use the Twitter API, scan the list of people you are following, and search for people by that username on Plurk. It wouldn&#8217;t be perfect, but it would make things much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logo design</title>
		<link>http://www.jonbishop.com/2008/06/plurk-vs-twitter/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Logo design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bishport.com/?p=36#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I almost always enjoy what I read on this site. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost always enjoy what I read on this site. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
